What has the LAPD done now? According to L.A. Weekly, the police have used the supposedly terror investigation only StingRay technology and spied upon non-suspects.
StingRay tapped over 13 percent of mobile phone inspections from June to September 2012
The LAPD has been getting some heat recently for inappropriate use of StingRay cellular phone technology. The technology was only supposed to be used in terrorism cases, but it turns out that is not all the LAPD was doing. In fact, of the 155 StingRay cases from last year between June and Sept, 13 percent exposed innocent non-suspects. The LAPD officials have not commented on the technology and whether or not it was used illegally, but it was specifically given to them in 2006 with subsidies from the federal Department of Homeland Security to be able to track terrorism. It has been found that the technology is used in many burglary, homicide and drug cases as well.
The First Amendment Coalition executive director Peter Scheer does not think the LAPD should be able to use this kind of technology. It is virtually extremely hard to avoid intercepting other people with the StingRay technology, according to those who use the technology, but the LAPD manuals do not even make it clear whether or not this is unlawful.
No court order needed
With StingRay, regulators can keep monitors with them in complete secret as opposed to the past when regulators had to get a court order before using them. StingRay is bothersome to civil rights activists for this very reason.
How should StingRay fit in with privacy regulations?
Privacy laws have to be addressed since StingRay might be hurting a lot of privacy rights for customers. Many attorneys agree with ACLU attorney Linda Lye who believes that the law needs to look at StingRay and create brand new legislation so privacy violations will be avoided.
StingRay tapped over 13 percent of mobile phone inspections from June to September 2012
The LAPD has been getting some heat recently for inappropriate use of StingRay cellular phone technology. The technology was only supposed to be used in terrorism cases, but it turns out that is not all the LAPD was doing. In fact, of the 155 StingRay cases from last year between June and Sept, 13 percent exposed innocent non-suspects. The LAPD officials have not commented on the technology and whether or not it was used illegally, but it was specifically given to them in 2006 with subsidies from the federal Department of Homeland Security to be able to track terrorism. It has been found that the technology is used in many burglary, homicide and drug cases as well.
The First Amendment Coalition executive director Peter Scheer does not think the LAPD should be able to use this kind of technology. It is virtually extremely hard to avoid intercepting other people with the StingRay technology, according to those who use the technology, but the LAPD manuals do not even make it clear whether or not this is unlawful.
No court order needed
With StingRay, regulators can keep monitors with them in complete secret as opposed to the past when regulators had to get a court order before using them. StingRay is bothersome to civil rights activists for this very reason.
How should StingRay fit in with privacy regulations?
Privacy laws have to be addressed since StingRay might be hurting a lot of privacy rights for customers. Many attorneys agree with ACLU attorney Linda Lye who believes that the law needs to look at StingRay and create brand new legislation so privacy violations will be avoided.
About the Author:
Resource for this article: why now don't look into https://personalmoneynetwork.com/cash-advance/?
0 comments :
Dí lo que piensas...