Republican and democratic parties are the parties that are popularly known all over the world. People are given freedom to follow the party they have believe in. Each party aims at increasing the number of members. This is done through the campaigns to create awareness to the public. Each party has members who represent them in all regions. Outlined below are findings on the constitutional republic vs democracy.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
Countries with democracy form of ruling are reported to have an increase in the margin due to the improved economy. The affairs of such a state are stable as the leaders negotiate and compromise with the citizens in case of a conflict. This leads to peace in the general nation.
However, countries that apply this form of government have challenges that make it hard to function properly. Democratic method of ruling is a quantitative method. It only emphasizes on numerical figures of majority in the country. Citizens are after quality and productive leaders who will help them to develop their economy. The method uses the rule of unskilled and incompetent leaders.
Citizens in a republican enjoy fair running of government, as the citizens are the ones who empower their leaders. There is a common welfare in running of activities as the leaders and the citizens have the same goals and objectives. There is also prosperity in economy as leaders who understand what the citizens go through represent them in a government. The leaders understand the hustles these citizens go through, as they are familiar with all the activities involved.
Under the republican method, the leaders are accountable for their actions. This means if the commit any wrong in office, they will be charged under the country law. The lawmakers carefully review each law before making it the law of land. This strictness ensures all citizens have equal rights even those who hold public office. The laws are made separate for each arm of government. This makes it to hold each member in any arm of government accountable.
There are also demerits of having a republican style of government. The main one is this method makes it hard to implement. Non-government officials are too involved in running of the government. Such a method of ruling makes a government vulnerable to those who want to satisfy their own agenda. Such disruption of normal government activities is costly.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
Countries with democracy form of ruling are reported to have an increase in the margin due to the improved economy. The affairs of such a state are stable as the leaders negotiate and compromise with the citizens in case of a conflict. This leads to peace in the general nation.
However, countries that apply this form of government have challenges that make it hard to function properly. Democratic method of ruling is a quantitative method. It only emphasizes on numerical figures of majority in the country. Citizens are after quality and productive leaders who will help them to develop their economy. The method uses the rule of unskilled and incompetent leaders.
Citizens in a republican enjoy fair running of government, as the citizens are the ones who empower their leaders. There is a common welfare in running of activities as the leaders and the citizens have the same goals and objectives. There is also prosperity in economy as leaders who understand what the citizens go through represent them in a government. The leaders understand the hustles these citizens go through, as they are familiar with all the activities involved.
Under the republican method, the leaders are accountable for their actions. This means if the commit any wrong in office, they will be charged under the country law. The lawmakers carefully review each law before making it the law of land. This strictness ensures all citizens have equal rights even those who hold public office. The laws are made separate for each arm of government. This makes it to hold each member in any arm of government accountable.
There are also demerits of having a republican style of government. The main one is this method makes it hard to implement. Non-government officials are too involved in running of the government. Such a method of ruling makes a government vulnerable to those who want to satisfy their own agenda. Such disruption of normal government activities is costly.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
0 comments :
Dí lo que piensas...