Saturday, December 26, 2015

Global War On Terror Memorial

By Harold West


The whole idea of memorials in the subject of terrorism constitutes the need to remember and express our heartfelt feelings to those whose lives have been cut short because of bomb blasts. States should therefore join hands in a bid to win the Global War on Terror Memorial. It is because a good fraction of the global population has been eliminated inhumanly by wicked men and women.

The loss and pain that comes with these bombings has made governments to review their plan actions to end the constant security threats caused by terrorists. By so doing, the government will not have to spend a lot of finances funding the establishments of new memorials and maintaining them. Instead, these moneys will be channeled towards other development projects.

The use of drone attacks in the military attacks in Islamic nations by the west to suppress the effect of extremist has been a bone of contention between these conflicting forces. Declaring a halt in drone attacks has been viewed as a move to end the increased retaliations by the Al-Qaeda to counter the infiltration caused by the United States. An end to drones will stop the need of Al-Qaeda leaders to recruit many new members to their front at a high rate than we can kill them.

Most governments arrest alleged perpetrators and subject them to brutality. Jihadists see this to be utter hypocrisy in the delivery of justice. These acts of holding people without any charges or trials show that governments do not follow the same laws they uphold. Therefore, to reduce the effect of these attacks on the global population, government should order their (suspected terrorists) release.

The indiscriminate airstrikes by the United States in the Islamic states in the Middle East leave many lives lost and many are left with lifetime injuries. Most of these people seek redress which is usually inadequate if at all they are compensated. Offering genuine apologies to these innocent victims and compensating them accordingly will reduce the acts of terror.

National governments usually deploy military personnel and fight contractors to areas believed to be hiding areas of terrorist groups. The feeling of insecurity plays in when they notice that their peace is jeopardized. This prompts them to seek access to target nations where they cause serious bloodshed through bomb blasts. This situation would be well controlled if the troops are ordered out of those areas.

The support that the United States has been giving to dictatorship regimes and repressive leadership to achieve political advantages has brought about resistances by terror groups who want their voice heard. An example is the arms agreement that US made with Saudi Arabia to enable them roll tanks to suppress the action of protesters in the neighboring Bahrain. These efforts to distract peaceful demonstrations have made terrorists to take up retaliatory action by killing innocent lives.

Adherence to international rule of law by key nations in their war against killing by bombings will significantly reduce the loss of life in the frequent bombings. Most nations who afford to capture terror suspects usually carry out their killing without regard to international laws. Putting an end to these prejudicial assassinations will be a good move to win the fight against terror memorials.




About the Author:



0 comments :

Dí lo que piensas...

 
twitter facebook google plus linkedin rss feed email